• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
The Learner First
  • Home
  • Contributive Learning
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • Impact
    • Case Studies
    • Books and Articles
  • Blog
  • Menu Menu

Assessment: What’s the Fuss All About?

Article

By Mary Coverdale, Executive Director at The Learner First Australia.

The COVID-19 pandemic has perhaps unwittingly created a sliding doors moment in education. One consequence has been a global awareness of the scale of educational inequality that reflects the broader social issues which have spawned a deep divide in communities across the globe. While equity concerns have primarily centered on access to online learning and the disparity between the “haves” and “have nots” with regard to computers, Internet access, and levels of support in the home, remote learning has also prompted discussions around assessment—namely, the complexities and complications that exist in a system that has attempted to patch traditional modes of testing into contemporary learning environments. Assessment methodology as we have known it has expired. In many ways, it has served as a barrier to the gateways students have to career options, effectively excluding rather than including many of our learners. Now, we have an opportunity to reflect on why, what, and how we assess, and to examine how our practices do or don’t serve the best interests of our students and communities. We must ask the question: for whom do we assess? Is it done for the system, or for the benefit of the learner? We have to place students at the center of assessment.

It’s undeniable that our students’ experiences and futures differ greatly from anything the teaching profession, let alone the world, has experienced in the past. The uncertainty that existed prior to the COVID crisis is now amplified, and in managing the unpredictability of what has been a powerful external influence, nations, systems, and schools have scrambled to limit its impact on learning outcomes, adapting teaching and learning models to try to maintain student progression. Perhaps ironically, the situation has provided an existential opportunity to better and more meaningfully reach our goal of “every student succeeding,” because it has offered us a richer and more holistic understanding of student, and human, success. With that, the door is open to adjusting our assessment modalities to match this understanding, while also maintaining the integrity of achievement standards.

Why is assessment so important? Assessment outcomes can inform identity, create human hierarchies, and open or close gateways to opportunity, particularly in terms of career choices. There’s no doubt that the assessment “playbook” is being challenged in ways that are part cultural and philosophical and part driven by equity in a world where the historical division between blue- and white-collar workers is increasingly blurred by new industries and social structures. These old, culturally embedded ways of perceiving the worth of or predicting potential pathways are tropes that must change in order to respect and respond to the needs of our learners and expand the viable life opportunities they can access. But old habits die hard. The bias in our system toward single measures that represent cognitive or academic outcomes to the exclusion of other inherent and learned competencies runs counter to respecting and valuing the diversity of every child and their abilities—the beautiful differences that make up the richness of complementary skills in our communities. The rhetoric in well-being and inclusion policies that claim that all students should succeed hasn’t transferred into systemizing ways of assessing that reflect the breadth of student aptitudes, dispositions, and interests beyond cognitive capacity. What we currently have is a completely reductionist methodology that is inauthentic, unjust, and out of touch with our current world reality. It’s hard to know how or why a “one-size-fits-all” way of assessing the success of a student maintains its legitimacy in our complex and chaotic world. What is to some a sensible, logical shift to a fairer system is to many, inside and outside education, a radical disruption that will undermine achievement standards and threaten the system itself. But, like in any evolving system, there comes a time for a retune to reset design for optimal performance.

“Teach the whole child” is a long-standing mantra that has meant many things to many people. It is well reflected in valiant attempts by practitioners to engage students in their learning by shifting pedagogical practices, adjusting curriculum, and engaging in well-being programs. However, some students learn to “fail school” from an early age, and that learned failure becomes a part of their identity. The belief that they are “no good at school” becomes vested in their mindset, which then impacts their engagement and overall behavior. It also negatively impacts their future. Students are led to believe that if they’re no good at school they’ll be no good beyond it. But that isn’t the case—there are so many ways to be successful in life, and we have to reflect that in our systems of assessment.

The concept of 21st-century skills is tired. For decades, there has been evidence that the skills our students require to be successful and healthy citizens are much broader than those reflected in academic prowess. It’s accepted that a combination of social and cognitive skills is what nourishes and nurtures us and enables us to flourish. In a simple sense, the need to embed these basic skills requires a combination of capabilities integrated into pedagogical practices. Our quest must be to have these skills valued by the system and to systemize ways of assessing and measuring them. At the moment, teachers are being asked to fit a square peg into a round hole.

We know that assessment for and as learning works best when the student is involved in the process of reflection and feedback, and that this agency creates student engagement. How often do teachers share the achievement standards with their students? It seems not often. And yet, when learning goals are precise and reflect the standard, when students are given choice about how they will demonstrate those standards, and when they collaborate to undertake the learning, it enhances both well-being and academic outcomes and supports the development of important dispositions. It seems like such a straightforward understanding. However, in reality, it’s anything but.

How and what we assess are governed by deeply held assumptions about summative assessment. Many teachers assume that the word “summative” refers to “the sum of learning outcomes.” But, better still, summative can and should refer to “a collection of learning evidence”—evidence which can then be synthesized, measured, and reported. When understood in this way, assessment is no longer simply a culmination by which students are separated into the “good” and the “bad,” but instead a process through which students are given opportunities to evidence their learning in personally relevant ways, develop key outcomes, and grow individually and collectively.

The language of assessment must shift in a period when long-held certainties are shifting as well. The concept of a test or standardized exam being “fair and equal for all” is being challenged on the basis of equity and inclusion, two key drivers of a contemporary education system. These two drivers, when unpacked with an eye toward the purpose and nature of assessment, raise challenging questions about bias and the status quo of practice. Leaders and teachers, when confronted with change, often cling to “the way we have always done things here,” determined to apply past concepts to present practice. Progress is often undermined by a view of what’s expected by the system—by the system, for the system, of the system! This creates an essential paradox.

The teacher in the classroom is confronted with the impossible task of serving two main masters: (1) the moral duty of care to differentiate instruction and assessment in ways that support every child to experience success in their learning journey, and (2) the requirement to report an overall academic grade for each student to the system—a grade which must be consistent and comparable across schools, reflect an accurate understanding of each student’s learning levels (demonstrated against the achievement standards), and reflect a thorough knowledge of curriculum content. The tension, here—big data principles versus differentiation for the individual—is the tension between wanting to know and understand students on a holistic level and having to report evidence that’s considered valid and reliable. Professional capacity and trust are at the center of this conversation. So, too, are anxiety and fear. Activating the reflective practice of teachers to not only adjust the curriculum and pedagogy, but also to differentiate what they collect as evidence of learning, is a quantum culture and practice shift for many teachers. On top of that, even when a teacher diligently collects evidence, moderates that evidence, and uses it alongside a test or exam, there are still concerns that the teacher’s individual judgement shouldn’t be trusted. This reflects a tragic erosion of community perception of teachers. Teachers are professionals—we need to treat them that way.

What skills do we value in our students in 2021? Do we believe that the real value of education exists in knowledge transfer or in the development of a broad set of competencies and other outcomes, including knowledge development, which enable and empower students with the skills to find their way in the present and future? What are the implications of our beliefs for systems and schools? It’s time to take what we now know and understand and map it to a new way of thinking. We can enable the necessary shifts by building teachers’ capacity, supporting them to be confident and competent in teaching and assessing capabilities alongside academic skills, and in becoming activators and facilitators of learning as opposed to merely “expert adults.” If we truly believe that the nature of evidence of progress and growth is the key—that differentiation, personalization, validity, accuracy, focus, and alignment lead to equity and inclusion—then change is necessary—not soon, but now.

Efforts in this space will benefit greatly from approval and permission from the system itself. But progress is possible and already happening—grassroots practitioners with high moral purpose are paving the way. Their experience suggests that it’s important that teachers have guidelines and support to undertake the following:

  • Know the standards
  • Know the capabilities
  • Know the students
  • Ask the students
  • Develop inquiry questions
  • Determine pedagogies
  • Apply the curriculum
  • Apply learning progressions (ongoing) – embedded and aligned across domains
  • Gather evidence of learning
  • Synthesize evidence to create a reportable measurement

From uniforms to assessment, we have been wedded to consistency in our application of the rules. It’s a broad-brush methodology loosely justified on being equal or fair to all. But it’s led us instead to exactly the opposite—we’ve learned, without realizing it, to discriminate on the basis of cognitive capacity. We have learned to justify inequity. We’ve learned, through focusing on exams, to justify exclusion. The rules are first, not the child. The dominant narrative must shift, so that the learner takes center stage, the teachers are supported to put learners at the center, and the skills we see emerging from our school systems represent those that both the child and the world need.

November 23, 2021/by The Learner First
Tags: TLF Australia
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://www.thelearnerfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Depositphotos_432662346_L.jpg 1143 2000 The Learner First https://www.thelearnerfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/TLF-Website-Logo-300x90.png The Learner First2021-11-23 18:02:492022-01-12 11:53:32Assessment: What’s the Fuss All About?
You might also like
Don’t Let the Past Block Your Path to the Future
Profile of a Principal in Liminal Times
The First 125 Hours
Moments of Joy
The Educational Dartboard
Leading Change: The Steady Path on the Roller Coaster

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR BLOG

Twittter

Tweets by @TheLearnerFirst

Archives

  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015

Categories

  • Article
  • Essay
  • Fun
  • Instructional
  • Interview
  • News
  • Paper
  • Thought Piece
  • Uncategorized

Have any questions? Please get in touch!

CONTACT US

Email general inquiries to info@thelearnerfirst.com or find more contact info here.

We have businesses registered in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand and work with educators and schools in countries around the world.

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Learner First, and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

About | Contact | FAQ | Terms

© 2018 Enfold by Kriesi

The Learner First © 2022 - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Goldendale School District Awarded WSSDA Board of the YearGoing Toward vs. Going Away
Scroll to top
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. ACCEPT Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non Necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

Save & Accept